More than four million tonnes of food is being wasted by supermarkets and farmers every year because of customers’ exacting standards, a report into hunger in Britain has revealed.
“Scandalously huge” volumes of perfectly edible fruit, vegetables, bread, meat
and milk is send for landfill, or burnt for energy at taxpayers’ expense,
because it fails to meet the “cosmetic” demands of consumers, a report drawn
up by MPs and backed by the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Rt Reverend Justin
Welby, will say today.
In a highly political intervention, the Archbishop endorses a demand that the
Government supports a new network for “Feeding Britain”, with a package of
measures that could cost £150 million.
He yesterday said the sight of “ashamed” families visiting food banks shocked
him more than the starvation he had seen in Congolese refugee camps.
The report, from the All Party All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Hunger
reveals that just 0.1 per cent of all “surplus” food fit for human
consumption is donated to food banks and other schemes to help the poor,
compared to nearly 32 per cent in the United States, the report reveals.
It warned that the use of “best before” and “display until” labels is causing
shops to discard fresh foods.
The “cosmetic standards” demanded by supermarkets is also encouraging waste,
with some farmers losing up to 20 per cent of their carrot harvest thanks to
retailers refusing to accept “wonky” vegetables.
In total, retailer discard 0.4 million tonnes of food while producers send 3.9
million tonnes to landfill or spreading a year.
One food bank manager told the inquiry that he was offered 9,864 Cornish
pasties because a lorry was 17 minutes late for his distribution deadline to
Morrisons. He was also offered 30,000 spring greens that were due to be
reploughed into the fields, and 10 tonnes of tomatoes that were deemed “too
big for Tesco”, the report said.
Morrisons said it was “puzzled” by the claim, saying it is not company policy
to turn away fresh food.
The report claims the taxpayer is paying for thousands of tonnes of food to be
destroyed for green energy, through a process known as anaerobic digestion.
A £10 million fund subsidises the programme, at a rate of £70 a tonne.
The report finds there are now around 1,500 food banks providing emergency
meals to the poor, and their numbers have risen steeply under the Coalition.
It blames telephone companies, energy giants, water firms and government
premium rate phone lines for “ripping off” poor customers and leaving them
unable to afford food.
It calls on ministers to drive up the minimum wage, expand the system of
school meals and loosen the regime of benefits sanctions, including
introducing a ‘yellow card’ for people who face having payments docked.
However, the report notes that phenomenon of working families being unable to
afford food is not unique to Britain or the sole fault of the current
government, but a result of “fundamental” changes in advanced Western
economies, with a decline in skilled manufacturing and a growth of low-paid
work over thirty years.
Between 2004 and 2011, the share of income spent on housing, food and
utilities increased for the first time in post-war Britain, leaving smaller
disposable incomes.
That was in part because Britain has seen some of the highest levels of
inflation in the West. Prices have risen 30.4 per cent in the decade since
2013, compared to 28.4 per cent in the US, 19.8 per cent in France and 19.6
per cent in Germany.
Writing the report’s introduction, the Rt Rev Tim Thornton, the Bishop of
Thornton, said more people are going hunger because the “social glue” of
friendships and family life has disappeared, meaning neighbours living
“individualistic and isolated lives” cannot rely on each other for help.
Damian Green, the former policing minister, said that food banks “work well”
as charities and the Government should have no role in running them, as the
report suggests.
“What they’re saying is that the welfare state should take over food banks,
should nationalise food banks. All that would mean would be we’re spending a
bit more on welfare so I’m not quite sure what the additional value is.”
He said the Archbishop must accept he will face criticism if he wants to
intervene in political affairs.
"I don’t mind church leaders intervening in political issues as long as they
then accept that they are in the political arena. There is then a slight
feeling of well, it’s the Archbishop of Canterbury you mustn’t disagree with him. Well actually, I do disagree with him in some
respects.”
Matt Hancock, the business minister, said food bank use had increased “because
more people know about them”.
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: "This report is a serious contribution to an
important debate, and recognises that the reasons behind demands for
emergency food assistance are complex and frequently overlapping.
"As a country we have enough food to go around, and we agree that it is wrong
that anyone should go hungry at the same time as surplus food is going to
waste. There is a moral argument as well as a sustainability one to ensure
we make the best use of resources.”
Families who spend a quarter of income on cigarettes
FAMILIES are being driven to food banks because they spend up to a quarter of
their income on smoking, the report suggests.
Children are going hungry because parents are addicted to alcohol, gambling
and prioritise catalogue purchases over buying food, it found.
A family with an income of £21,000 a year where both parents smoke 20
cigarettes a day will spend a quarter of their income on tobacco.
It urges the state introduce cookery lessons for parents because some are
unable to produce a meal from scratch, leaving them reliant on expensive
ready meals and takeaways.
The panel said they were confronted with the “unpleasant truth” is that an
unknown number of children go to school hungry because of the “chaotic
conditions in their homes”.
It says schools should report such parents to social workers.
“A large proportion of primary schools that submitted evidence to the Inquiry
said they had witnessed children arriving at school hungry because their
parents could not, or would not, wake up to make them breakfast, or bring
them to the school breakfast club,” the report says.
“We heard also that some families did not have enough money to afford decent
food as their income was devoted almost entirely to having to pay off debts
from catalogues, credit companies and payday lenders.”
It said children who try to help vulnerable children should be applauded but
adds: “We should not leave the duty resting with schools. Parents have
duties, and these duties are not abated by the chaos resulting from their
lifestyle”.